Posts Tagged ‘Bastrop City Council’

Bastrop City Council says no to private airport proposal

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Bastrop, Tx–Austin developer James Carpenter won no Bastrop City Council support Tuesday for his plan to develop a 2,000-acre site west of town for a private general aviation airport and plots for related businesses. In fact the council instructed the city manager to prepare a resolution of non-support for the project, which will be forwarded to the state senator and state representative whose districts include Bastrop County.

The state lawmakers previously indicated they will not support creation of a special municipal utility district for the proposed airport without the endorsement of the city council and county commissioners. That suggests the council’s action Tuesday could doom the project, at least for the current legislative session.

Monday the Bastrop County commissioners held a hearing on the same topic but postponed any action on the issue, pending further public input which has been largely unfavorable so far.

Council Member Dock Jackson said the council action Tuesday came because of too little available information about the airport plan. Other council members voiced similar concerns both before and after a presentation by Carpenter about what he called a “massive economic development project” which could create thousands of well-paid jobs.

“There’s a lot more we need to learn,” said Council Member Julie Hart.

There’s likely too little time left during the present legislative session to work through the complex issues presented by the Carpenter proposal, said Council Member Joe Beal. “We’re hearing this for the first time (tonight),” Beal said Tuesday.

By state law the Legislature will adjourn at the end of May.

Bastrop city council rejects liquor variance request

Friday, March 13th, 2009

Bastrop, Tx–Last May the Bastrop City Council, without public opposition, waived a ban on beer and wine sales for off-site consumption to accomodatea possible convenience store near Emile Elementary School and Mt. Rose Missionary Baptist Church, both close to a new commercial development at the northwestern corner of Texas 95 and Texas 71 in the city.

But a move this week to extend the waiver to allow the sale of alcohol, including mixed drinks, for on-site consumption in the same commercial development in connection with a possible steak and seafood restauarant faced a chilly reception. In fact the council voted to deny the added waiver after hearing from the pastor and other officials at Mt. Rose.

Rev. R.D. Smith, in fact, chided the council for not notifying the church about the proposed package sales waiver last year. Mt. Rose officials were not notified of the pending application because its building lies 13 feet outside the 300-foot distance for notification required by law. “Our business has not been taken care of (by the city),” Smith said. “Our church feels like it was a slap in the face,” he added.

“We (the church) have been there 121 years. We abide by the law. We pay taxes,” said Smith. But “at 313 feet we don’t have to be notified?” He urged the council to remember “the spirit of the law (because) we want to know (about proposals which affect the neighborhood).”

“You can do better than what you’ve done,” Smith told the council Tuesday. “I hope it was just an oversight.”

Developer John Kleas said some steak and seafood restaurant chains have indicated interest in a site in the property being developed on the northwest corner of Texas 95 and Texas 71 closest to the church and the school. Those businesses routinely include beer, wine and mixed drink sales, he said.

Faced with both school and church opposition, council members showed little interest in approving the added alcohol sales waiver. Council Member Dock Jackson noted that a property being developed by the same owners on the southwest corner of Jackson and Texas 71 (directly across the highway from the convenience store site) lies well outside the 300-foot boundary and might be well suited for a restaurant/bar operation

The council vote to deny the additional exemption to normal alcohol sales rules was unanimous.